By Luis Manuel Aguana
During the ANCO Conversation Forum in Maturín, I compared the situation
of the official opposition with that of a domino player who, raising a hand of
7 whites, preferred to let the game run until the end, running the risk of
being won without being blocked, hoping that the count would help him. And I
asked them, and who doesn't lock a hand like that? Why negotiate if you can
take everything with you, if you know that the opponent's hand is lost because
you have the whites To be able to clean up what is left of our country after
this tragedy, you have to win the game by taking them out of power, not claim
half or what the regime wants to give you after a negotiation.
That is why I have always believed that since they are not
"blocking the game" having the certainty of winning, it is because
they are sold to the regime. Let's see: Who do the majority of Venezuelans
favor in order to get out of Maduro? The regime or the opposition? Who do more
than fifty countries back, who are willing to support what the Government in
Charge of Juan Guaidó decides? But we still find ourselves
"negotiating" with the regime. And I ask myself, negotiating what?
What was it that we Venezuelans missed that we couldn't understand if we whites
didn't calm down the game?
Forgive the colloquiality of the comparison, but I still can't reach the
people to explain what we consider obvious. How is it that personalities of the
intellectual world write letters indicating that we mistreated Guaidó in social
networks? That is not Guaidó, for God's sake! It is the path chosen by the
opposition to get out of the usurpation! With that what they do is hide the
bottom saying that we are against who appears publicly as the responsible.
For my Guaidó he can stay as long as he wants -in fact he is in
campaign-. Moreover, I want him to head the Transitional Government, over those
who want to see their heads roll, skipping that transition by using an election
with the regime. But please don't sell to Venezuelans that we are against Juan
Guaidó, using a ploy to cover up an indefensible electoral arrangement.
Why are those anchors of the official opposition intellectuals who
criticize the fact that we are messing with the saint, hiding that the regime
and the opposition they defend are taking alms through the back door with
elections? Why don't they say that we are against elections? Why do they insist
that we are against Guaidó? That's what people have to ask themselves. While
more than 90% of the country wants them to leave, the opposition is looking for
an electoral compromise with the regime to keep them. Who understands that
stupidity?
So this is where I want to emphasize our plebiscite proposal. This
proposal goes against the electoral proposal of the regime and its official
opposition. Why is the Plebiscite an equally electoral proposal not openly
debated? Why don't the communicational anchors of the opposition discuss it in
the same way as the elections in their programs by social networks or radio
programs? Why?
I have a theory that would answer that. The official opposition does not
want to leave the regime out and uses all its communicational influence to
avoid it. Thousands of reasons, starting with the most obvious, corruption.
With a Plebiscite that openly declares to the International Community the
unanimous rejection of the population to continue in Miraflores the delinquents
that ungovern us, the whole "establishment" castro-chavista-madurista
would have to disappear to give way to a Transitional Government "without
enclaves of the regime," as Henry Ramos Allup's theory maintains. That is,
do not block the game of dominoes even if all the whites have been lifted. And
that in this case is criminal because it prolongs the suffering of the people,
because it produces more deaths of Venezuelans due to medicines, diseases and
hunger, because it deepens the bloodshed of our youth in that massive exodus.
And a plebiscite gives us the certainty of winning and collecting. You
will say and why are you so sure that they would leave with a Plebiscite?
Because the manifestation of the people would be so overwhelming and forceful
that it would be practically impossible for the International Community to
materially refuse to mobilize in favor of the Venezuelan people. That the UN
Security Council would look green to oppose a humanitarian intervention when
requested by the population itself. It would be unprecedented! The structure of
the questions we have proposed indicates this:
1) Do you demand the immediate cessation of the
usurpation of presidential powers exercised by Nicolás Maduro Moros?
2) Do you demand that the citizen Juan Guaidó
Márquez fully exercise his powers as President in Charge of the Bolivarian
Republic of Venezuela, and in that condition, constitute a Transitional
Government and call free, fair and transparent elections?
3) Do you request the International Community to
take immediate and effective measures, with the objective of protecting and
helping the people, carrying out the necessary actions to stop the very serious
and continuous violations of Human Rights in Venezuela?
(See Comunicado
ANCO: Un Plebiscito para que el Pueblo Soberano Decida, en https://ancoficial.blogspot.com/2019/07/comunicado-anco-un-plebiscito-para-que.html).
With the first question the people would decide the
Cessation of the Usurpation of Nicolás Maduro Moros, without mistake: WE DO NOT
WANT IT. It would not be Juan Guaidó, nor would it be the official opposition.
WE VENEZOLANS fired him (Donald Trump will like that: You're fired!).
With the second question, Venezuelans would be giving
full popular support to citizen Juan Guaidó Márquez as the President of the
Transition to call an electoral process that guarantees free, fair and
transparent elections; and to exercise the Transitional Government with all the
powers conferred by the Constitution to the President of the Republic.
So far Guaidó is a president held in pins. This
plebiscite legitimizes him and gives him the political floor to act above all
political parties and would silence the mouths of all countries that still
doubt his legitimacy. No more the excuse of not appointing a Cabinet to govern.
After the Plebiscite there would no longer be the expression "the
self-proclaimed" President Juan Guaidó. In the small letters of the
questions (see in detail ANCO's communiqué with the complete proposal) it is
established how those elections would be carried out to guarantee the
completion of the Transition those free, fair and transparent elections. NOBODY
can say that this is an "anti-Guaidó" proposal, ALL THE CONTRARY is
to Juan Guaidó the one that best suits him because it would imply the support
of the Venezuelan people to act.
But the third question is fundamental. It is the
Venezuelan people who are asking for the intervention of the International
Community to protect and help the Venezuelan people against a regime that
exercises power and is responsible for crimes against humanity in our
territory. Once again, it is the Venezuelan people who launch an SOS to the
world. Do you believe that with this permission the countries that have
recognized Guaidó will slip through the cracks? They would have no alternative
but to intervene and hand over power to Juan Guaidó because that is what the
Venezuelans decided in this Plebiscite.
Now, it is clear that this plebiscite consultation
CANNOT BE CARRIED OUT WITH THE CORROMPT POWER OF REGIME and that we must use
civil society and international organizations, such as the OAS, the EU, the
Lima Group, the IDEA Group, etc., to count the votes of Venezuelans in that
Plebiscite because the regime's NEC cannot be used.
How long should we repeat and explain that this
Plebiscite cannot take place without the international pressure of friendly
countries and without the internal pressure of Venezuelans? That the regime
WILL NOT ALLOW this process if they don't put a gun to his temple. And that gun
represents the power of the most important nations in the world interested in
an electoral and democratic solution for Venezuela. And the most paradoxical
thing about this whole issue is that those who would benefit politically would
be the G4 parties themselves because they are the ones who manage the National
Assembly and the constitutional heirs of power, and in no case do we propose
this solution.
It is time for the horses to stand in front of the
cart. It is time to stop this game. Venezuelans already have a serious
differential proposal to discuss in the face of Chimbas elections with the
regime. Now they are the ones who have the floor...
Caracas, July 26, 2019
Email: luismanuel.aguana@gmail.com
Twitter:@laguana
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario