By Luis Manuel Aguana
Your Excellency, Ambassador:
With a great deal of respect I am writing to you as a representative
friend of Venezuela, on the premise that you have a real and legitimate
interest in helping us to emerge from this serious political crisis of our
Nation. I dare to send this letter, as one more citizen who suffers from this
crisis, to the ambassador friend whom I do not know, so that he may possibly
carry this message to his country in the hope that the common Venezuelan's
position can be better understood in the face of the appalling tragedy that we
are suffering.
There are no simple answers to complex problems. However, wisdom lies in
being able to give them despite the difficulties that this entails. That is why
Ghandi, Mandela, Churchill, and more locally Romulo Betancourt, Rafael Caldera
and Jóvito Villalba, managed to communicate to their respective peoples a clear
path to follow in the midst of the difficulties. Maybe that's why we met in
this tremedal. The leadership does not succeed in clearly communicating to
people a clear path despite all the communication technology that we have at
this time.
The official opposition grouped in the G4 of the so-called MUD remains
that, the official representative of those who do not agree with the government
in front of the international community. And it is making use of that condition
to take us to a slaughterhouse in the Dominican Republic, although at this
moment they do not represent anyone, not even their own militants. I believe
that this situation should be seriously considered by you in the Diplomatic
Corps before committing to recognize them as the official opposition of
Venezuela.
The Ambassadors of the world in Venezuela, and especially those of some of
the friendly countries of the so-called Group of Lima, have insisted on
unifying without scrutinizing in detail the diversity, the criteria of the
entire Venezuelan opposition universe to attend this dialogue-slaughterhouse
forgetting a fundamental premise: already the Venezuelan people categorically
pronounced the 16J. Any deviation from any supposed representative opposing
that pronouncement is a betrayal of that verdict.
Why do Venezuelans reject
that meeting in the Dominican Republic?
a) There are no representatives of Venezuelans in that meeting. Those who
are there ceased to represent the majority of Venezuelans, because even though
they were legitimately elected on 6D-2015, they ignored the 16J mandate of a
consultation that the National Assembly itself decided at the July 5, 2017
session to consult the people the course of action to follow to resolve the
crisis in the country. In fact, it can be said without exaggeration that the
Alianza Soy Venezuela is more representative of the spirit of the 7.6 million
Venezuelans who believed in that leadership that now is allowed to blackmail by
the regime for a crust of bread and the extortion of their prisoners
politicians. Venezuelans have the blood of Libertadores.
b) It goes without conditions of participation. Before sitting down, the Nicolás Maduro regime must allow humanitarian aid, release the political prisoners and restore the functions of the National Assembly without conditions. You can not negotiate about the hunger or the suffering of the prisoners. It would be blackmail. Do not negotiate with a kidnapper who points his gun over your head.
c) The regime gains time to continue searching for resources for its survival. The National Assembly can not approve appeals on the basis of recognition of an unconstitutional instance. And if it did, it would be illegal.
Why is the Constituent of Maduro not accepted?
a) Because it is a constitutional fraud. The President had no power of convocation, as the entire Venezuelan and international legal community has shown. The 30J elections were conducted by the Maduro regime, ignoring the majority mandate of the people of question 1 of the 16J plebiscite, without taking into account the well-founded allegations of technical fraud in that process.
b) Still, having carried out this process under these conditions, the constituent ignores its role in drafting a constitution and rises as a supra-power over the 1999 constitution that has NOT BEEN REPEATED BY THE PEOPLE IN REFERENCE TO THE APPROVAL OF A NEW CONSTITUTION, dismissing public powers and assuming functions of approving laws that only belong to the National Assembly.
How is this resolved?
Only by resorting to Original Power. It has reached such a state of
institutional disorder that the only way to channel the country's crisis is to
summon the constituent in the manner established in the Constitution. The
proposal is to follow the 16J route while resolving the intrigue of the
unconstitutional constituent, consulting with the people on matters of national
significance, whether it dissolves that instance including all its acts and
consulting them on whether or not it ultimately wishes to truly establish a
constituent process. Likewise, to consult with the people on the dissolution of
Nicolás Maduro's government, as well as the rest of the public powers,
including the National Assembly, in accordance with the spirit of question 3 of
the 16J Plebiscite, but this time for a legitimate Constituent to designate it
from its bosom. And in the event that a constituent is not approved - because
it is the people alone that can decide that - it should be designated according
to the constitutional rule of 1999, where the next valid in the presidential
succession summons the people to presidential elections.
Although it is something simple to understand and communicate with the
Venezuelan people, it is prevented by a web of cross interests. However, who
forces the militarized drug regime of Nicolas Maduro to agree that the people
be counted in popular consultation and decide their own destiny? The answer
comes from outside and with the help of the international community you
represent, not from a dialogue with criminals.
Already the international pressure has had its effects. The regime is like
the rats when the ship sinks. All sources of financing were cut off. All those
responsible cannot leave the country because they are on the search lists of
international narco-crime. What is missing? That they negotiate the terms of
their delivery before a swindled town. That can never be done with those who
were his accomplices in the embezzlement of the country and who intend to
continue in the Dominican Republic.
Ambassadors and Presidents of the friendly countries that believe in this
dialogue: the problem of the country will not be solved by the wrinkles of
Venezuela's hunger. With letting go humanitarian aid that the regime
already intends to administer with the mafias of CLAP, this is a piece of bread
for the Venezuelan family, and release some people who can return to their
dungeons when they decide, the regime will be screwed even more and you will be
responsible for that help.
As a Venezuelan who lives and suffers day by day from the tragedy of
this country, I can assure you that my compatriots will feel better served by
your help, not in filling their stomachs for one day, but in their dignity as a
people, if the help you offer us translates into the departure of these
criminals. Venezuela's history is full of anecdotes where Venezuelans prefer to
go hungry and needy before losing their dignity and freedom. Many Venezuelans
have given their lives for this reason in all their republican history. With a
lot of gratitude and respect for their management in Santo Domingo, we will get
the food after the criminals leave, and with the freedom we will surely get,
because that has been ours the legacy of our liberating ancestors.
With the greatest feelings of consideration and esteem,
Very truly yours,
Luis Manuel Aguana
Caracas, November 29, 2017
Blog: http://ticsddhh.blogspot.com/
Email: luismanuel.aguana@gmail.com
Twitter:@laguana
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario